
Volume
46 ~*~ 15 November 2007
|
|
-
Tefan, a global management consulting firm, just released its
analysis of the top ten healthcare challenges for 2008. On the
list, along with emergency care, nursing shortages, and the burdens of
the aging baby boomers, was the skyrocketing rate of cesareans and
inductions.
- In a Consumer Reports' investigation, Cesarean Section makes the list of most overused and "inefficient" procedures.
-
Approaching
31%, Australia's Cesarean rate appears to rival that of the United
States. Sheila Kitzinger speaks out as to why it's not a
statistic to be proud of.
|
|

- The
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recently
issued updated evidence-based treatment recommendations to help reduce
the incidence of this frequent, but often preventable, cause of death
in gynecologic surgery patients, including Cesarean section.
-
In
the latest retrospective review of the available research, the
practice of amniotomy was found to increase the Cesarean risk while
having little effect on length of labor.
In
concluding this study, it is hypothesized that failure to close the
parietal and visceral peritoneum with sutures at the time of cesarean
section may markedly increase the postoperative occurrence of an
endometrioma in the skin incision scar.
|
|

Misinformation Surrounding Fetal Weight Estimation and Due-Dates -- Enough to Make Anyone Grumpy
Linda Johnson explains why... I am just feeling cranky tonight with all the misinformation that
I am seeing on this list. It isn't what the list members are saying. It
is the "BS" that they are being told. I wonder what the
docs and US techs think about Hadlock. He was the physician who figured
out the measurements for fetal parts such as the biparietal diameter,
femur length, etc. should be for the various gestational ages. His
premise was that for an average size baby (7-7.5 lbs), these are the
average measurements. There are actually 26 or more algorithms for
determining fetal weight/size. A good link with really technical/statistical stuff is www.emedicine.com/med/topic3281.htm or google fetal biometrics.
All of these measurements are based on averages of babies from the
10th-90th percentile for that gestational age, but whether it is
ethnically and racially representative may be questionable. (Think the
average Vietnamese vs. Swedes). If you have a baby that will have long
legs and probably be tall as an adult, then the femur length will
probably be in the 90th percentile and your baby will be predicted to
be macrosomic. If you have babies with smaller heads (10th percentile)
then the baby will probably be predicted to be IUGR.
Now if those measurements are used as the basis for determining the
due date because the docs just don't believe the mom, a baby that is
smaller will be assumed to not be as far along in the pregnancy
because all babies will be 7-7.5# at birth (please note the sarcasm
there). The opposite is true with a baby that will be long. It appears
to be due sooner. None of that changes when conception occurred or when
term occurs (37-42 weeks).
Changing the due date based
on the US measurements shows a very basic misunderstanding of the
limits of US, the statistical significance of the algorithms, and the
expertise of the US tech. |
|

Do you live in the Southeast (KY, TN, WV,
VA, MD, DC, NC, SC, MS, GA, AL, FL) region of the US? Want to
join ICAN's team and help build new chapters and support existing
ones? ICAN International seeks applicants for the Southeast
Regional Coordinator. A volunteer suited to the job would have
time in their week for supporting ICAN's mission through recruiting new
chapter leaders, supporting existing ones through phone and email and
participating in our private Leaders-only email list. This is a
great way to assist in ICAN's mission and get more experience working
within the organization. Applicants can request the application
packet by emailing our Chapter Director at
chapters@ican-online.org |
|

Please consider using Yahoo Answers as
a medium for advocacy! Here's a tip: when asking about natural birth,
epidurals, inductions, VBACs or cesarean, most people "take sides"
rather than answering the specific question. Those don't tend to get
chosen as the "best answer." Instead, answer the question directly and
give resources and links to ICAN non-judgmentally.
Example:
Q. I don't want a vaginal birth. Can I force my doctor to deliver my baby by c-section?
Bad Answer. "I would NEVER have a c-section! It's horrible!!"
Good
Answer. "No, legally you cannot force your doctor to perform a cesarean
.... Here is some additional information on the topic:
http://www.ican-online.org. Source: International Cesarean Awareness
Network (ICAN)."
Let's answer some Questions!!
Come together the second
Monday of every month to chat with fellow ICANers. In a "chat
room" set up on MommyChats,
talk with fellow ICANers about birth, VBAC, cesarean healing, and
whatever other topics that come up. Ask questions, share
stories...it's all there on ICAN's MommyChat. The next chat
will
be Monday, December 10th. "See" you there!
|
. Got
something to say? Tell us! eNews@ican-online.org
ICAN's
mission is to improve maternal-child health by preventing unnecessary
cesareans through education, providing support for cesarean recovery,
and promoting Vaginal Birth After Cesarean (VBAC). This newsletter is
for informational purposes only and does not replace the advice of a
qualified birth professional. ICAN respects the Internet and the privacy
of those who use it. We do not rent or sell our e-mail list to anyone.
Copyright Notice: The content of ICAN eNews is copyrighted by The
International Cesarean Awareness Network, Inc. and, occasionally, other
rights holders. You may forward ICAN eNews by e-mail an unlimited
number of times, provided you do not alter the content in any way and
that you include all applicable notices and disclaimers. You may print
a single copy of each issue of eNews for your own personal,
non-commercial use only, provided you include all applicable notices
and disclaimers. Any other use of the content is strictly prohibited
without the prior written permission of The International Cesarean
Awareness Network, Inc. and any other applicable rights holders. © 2006 The International Cesarean
Awareness Network, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
|
|